References:
ACRL (2007). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education Retrieved 5/5/07, 2007, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm#ilhed
Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 391-405.
Ainley, M., & Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievment activites. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 267-286.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2006). Making the Grade: Online Education in the United States, 2006. Olin Way, Needham, MA 02492-1200: Sloan Consortium
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States, 2008: Slone Consortium
Allen, K. (2005). Online learning: constructivism and conversation as an approach to learning Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 247–256
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Pardo, A. (2002). Gender and interest processes in respone to library texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12, 411-428.
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Pardo, A. (2006). Assessment of learning environment motivational quality from the point of view of secondary and high school learners. Learning and Instruction, 16, 295-309.
Andriessen, I., Phalet, K., & Lens, W. (2006). Future goal setting, task motivation and learning of minority and non-minority students in Dutch schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 827-850.
Ann L Brown, R. R. C., John D Bransford (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: National Academy Press
Armstrong, D. (2003). Strategies for Professional Development of Faculty: Developing Constructivist Learning Environments in Higher Education and Establishing Partnership between Instructional Technology Research Specialists and Faculty. Paper presented at the E-Learn Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Armstrong, D. (2008). Learning in Online Instruction: A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Students Use of Online Tools. Paper presented at the International Conference on Interactive Computer Aided Learning, Villach, Austria.
Armstrong, D., & Calkins, M. (2000). A CD/Web-Based Team Project for Undergraduate Business Ethics Students. Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA 98--World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia ED-TELECOM 98 World Conference on Educational Telecommunications, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Association, A. P. (1997). Lerarner-Centered Psychological Prinicpals: A Framework for School Reform & Redesign. Washington, DC 20002 American Psychological Association.
Averill, S., & Hall, T. B. (2005). An observatory of eLearning in Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Europe - The Promise versus the Reality. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005, E-Learn 2005--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education.
Azevedo, R., Moos, D., Greene, J., Winters, F., & Cromley, J. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(1), 45-72.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bangert, A. W. (2004). The Seven Principles of Good Practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching The Internet and Higher Education 7(3), 217-232.
Ben-Jacob, M. G., Levin, D. S., & Ben-Jacob, T. K. (2000). The Learning Environment of the 21st Century. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6, 201-211.
Benson, D. E., & Mekolichick, J. (2007). Conceptions of Self and the Use of Digital Technologies in a Learning Environment Education 127(4).
Biggs, J. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I-Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
Biggs, J. (1979). Individual differences in the study process and quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381-384.
Biggs, J. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studding: Study Process Questionnaire: Manual. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University Assessing for learning quality: II. Practice Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press. (pp. 165-203).
Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
Billings, D. M. (2000). A framework for assessing outcomes and practices in web-based courses in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 39(2), 60–67.
Blok, H., Oosdam, R. & Otter, M. E. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: a review. [Review]. Review of Educational Research, 72, 101-130.
Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
Boekaerts, M., De Koning, E., & Vedder, P. (2006). Goal-directed behavior and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals. Educational Psychologist, 41, 33-51.
Bond, C. S., Fevyer, D., & Pitt, C. (2004). Student reactions to online tools for learning to use the Internet as a study tool: Outside the comfort zone? Paper presented at the ASCILITE, Perth, Western Australia.
Bowles, M. S. (2004). Relearning to E-learn: strategies for electronic learning and knowledge. Melbourne Univ. Publishing: Melbourne
Brophy, J. (2005). Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist, 40, 167-176.
Brown, A., Bransford, J., & Cocking, R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, Dc: National Academy Press.
Bruken, R. (2003). Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load of in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 53-61.
Buckland, W. (2001). Promoting Deep Learning through the use of Effective Textbooks. Cinema Journal, 41, 121-128.
Burnett, P. C., Pillay, H., & Dart, B. C. (2003). The Influences of Conceptions of Learning and Learner Self-Concept on High School Students' Approaches to Learning School Psychology International, 54, 54-66.
Busk, P. (2006). Designing Effective Learning Environments. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Byung-Ro, L., Plucker, J., & Bichelmeyer, B. (2003). Learning by Web Design: How it Affects Graduate Student Attitiudes. College Teaching, 51, 13-19.
Cairncross, F. (2001). The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Is Changing our Lives (Compl Rev edition ed.): Harvard Business School Press.
Cairnecross, S., & Mannion, M. (2001). Interactive Multimedia and Learning: Realizing the Benefits. Inovation in Education and Teaching International(38), 156-164.
Campbell, J., Smith, D., Boulton-Lewis, G., Brownlee, J., Burnett, P. C., Carrington, S., et al. (2001). Students' Perceptions of Teaching and Learning: the influence of students' approaches to learning and teachers' approaches to teaching. Teachers & Teaching, 7, 173-187.
Carmen, C., & Kurubacak, G. (2002). The Use of the Internet to Teach Critical Thinking. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2002, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Carnwell, R. (2000). Approaches to Study and their Impact on the Need for Support and Guidence in Distance Learning. Open Learning, 15, 123-140.
Castells, M., Frenandez-Ardevol, M., Qio, J. L., & Sey, A. (2007). Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Chapman, C., Ramondt, L., & Smiley, G. (2005). Strong Community, Deep Learning: Exploring the Link. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 217–230
Chi-Yan, T., & Treaguest, D. (2003). Learning Genetics with Computer Dragons. Journal of Biological Education, 37, 96- 98.
Chickering, & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing The Seven Principles Retrieved May, 11, 2009, from http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education Retrieved May, 11, 2009, from www.csuhayward.edu/wasc/pdfs/End%20Note.pdf
Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2006). The Effect of Context-Based Video Instruction on Learning and Motivation in Online Courses The American Journal of Distance Education, 19, 215-227.
Cholowski, K. M., & Chan, L. K. S. (2004). Cognitive factors in student nurses’ clinical problem solving Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10, 85-95.
Ciesielka, D. (2008). Using a Wiki to Meet Graduate Nursing Education Competencies in Collaboration and Community Health. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(10).
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Coates, J. (2007). Generational Learning Styles San Francisco: LERN Books, a division of Learning Resources Network
Conti, G. J. (1990). Identifying your teaching style. In Michael W. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult Learning Methods (pp. 79-96). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
Cope, C., & Staehr, L. (2005). Improving students’ learning approaches through intervention in an information systems learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 181-197.
Cowman, S. (1998). The approaches to learning of student nurses in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 899-910.
Creedy, D. K., Mitchell, M., Seaton-Sykes, P., Cooke, M., Patterson, E., Purcell, C., et al. (2007). Evaluating a Web-Enhanced Bachelor of Nursing Curriculum: Perspectives of Third-Year Students Journal of Nursing Education, 46(10).
Cremeens, J., Eiser, C., & Blades, M. (2007). A qualitative investigation of school-aged children’s answers to items from a generic quality of life measure. Child: Care, Health & Development, 33(1), 83-89.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Chousing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Crutcher, R. A., Corrigan, R., O’Brien, P., & Schneider, C. G. (2007). College Learning for the New Global Cntury. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
D. Jonassen, J. H. (2003). Learning to Solve Problems with Technology" A Constructivist Perspective: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Dahlin, B. (2001). Critique of the schema Concept. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 287-292.
Darabi, A. A. (2005). Application of Cognitive Apprenticeship Model to a Graduate Course in Performance Systems Analysis: A Case Study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53, 49-61.
David, M. (1987). The the Effect of Instructional Computer Games on Continuing Student Motivation. Journal of Special Education, 21(4).
Davis, M., & Hult, R. (1997). Effects of Writing Summaries as a Generative Activity During Note Taking. Methods and Techniques, 24.
Dawley, L. (2007). The Tools for Successful Online Teaching. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing (an imprint of the Idea Group Inc.).
Deci, E. L. (2000). The Effects of Instructors' Autonomy Support and Students' Autonomous Motivation on Learning. Science Education, 84.
Denrell, J. (2007). Adaptive Learning and Risk Taking. Psychological Review, 114(1), 177-187.
Dictionary.com (2009). Computer-Aided Instruction Retrieved 1/19, 2009, from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Computer-Aided%20Instruction
Direct, H. R. (Producer). (2005, October 1, 2005) Learning Style Inventory Version 3.1 Online. Podcast retrieved from http://www.hayresourcesdirect.haygroup.com/.
Dixon, R., Dixon, K., & Siragusa, L. (2007). Individuals’ perceptions of online environments: What adult learners are telling us. Paper presented at the Ascilite, Singapore.
Dornan, T., Maredia, N., Hosie, L., Lee, C., & Stopford, A. (2003). A web-based presentation of an undergraduate clinical skills curriculum. Medical Education, 37(6), 500-508.
Dron, J. (2003). The Blog and the Borg: a Collective Approach to E-Learning. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post- Capitalist Society. Harper Business.
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Beyond the Information Revolution. The Atlantic Monthly, 284, no 4 (October).
Duff, A. (2003). Quality of Learning on an MBA Programme: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance Educational Psychology, 23, 123-139.
Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Ellis, R. A., Marcusw, G., & Taylorw, R. (2005). Learning through inquiry: student difficulties with online course-based Material. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 239-252.
Ellis, T. J. (2001). Multimedia Enhanced Educational Products as a Tool to Promote Critical Thinking in Adult Students. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 107-124.
Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of learning and Teaching: An integrative outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lectures. . Chichester, England: Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. New York: Nichols.
Entwistle, N., & Smith, C. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 321- 322.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: verbal reports as data (Revised ed.). London: MIT Press.
ETS (2002). Digital Transformation: A Framework for ICT Literacy.
ETS (2003). ICT Information & Communication Technology (No. M2052).
ETS (2005). An Overview of the Design and Architecture for the ICT Literacy Assessment Paper presented at the American Library Association Annual Conference.
ETS (2007). iSkills Retrieved 5/5/2007, 2007, from http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem.435c0b5cc7bd0ae7015d9510c3921509/?vgnextoid=b8a246f1674f4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD
ETS (2007). Higher Education ICT Literacy Assessment Fit with ACRL Standards Educational Testing Service
Evans, C. J., Kirby, J. R., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2003). Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 507–528.
Fearing, A., & Riley, M. (2005). Graduate Students' Perceptions Of Online Teaching and Relationship to Preferred Learning Styles. MEDSURG Nursing, 14, 383-389.
Feng, Y. (2005). Designing Activities to Promote Critical Thinking in a Graduate Distance Course. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005, Montreal, Canada.
Fischer, G. B. (1999). eveloping Students' Adaptive Learning Skills. College Teaching, 47.
Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice (2 ed.). New Yory: Teachers College Press.
Fox, R. A., McManus, I. C., & Winder, B. C. (2001). The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 511-530.
Frey, A., Faul, A., & Yankelov, P. (2003). Student Perceptions of Web-Assisted teaching Strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 443-457.
Gallini, J. K., & Barron, D. (2002). Participants' Perceptions of Web- Infused Environments: A Survey of Teaching Beliefs, Learning Approaches, and Communication Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 139-156.
Gijbels, D., Watering, G. V. d., Dochy, F., & Bossche, P. V. d. (2005). The relationship between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 327-341.
Gillaini, B. B. (2003). Learning Theories and the Design of E-Learning Environments. Lanham, Maryland: Univsersity Press of America.
Gillani, B. (2003). Learning Theories and the Design of E-Learning Environments. Lanham. Maryland: University Press of America.
Gobert, J. D. (2000). A typology of causal models for plate tectonics: Inferential power and barriers to understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 937-977.
Godwin, S. I., Thorpe, M. S., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2008). The impact of computer-mediated interaction on distance learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 52-70.
Gog, T. v., Ericsson, K. A., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2005). Instructional Design for Advanced Learners: Establishing Connections Between the Theoretical Frameworks of Cognitive Load and Deliberate Practice Educational Technology Research & Development, 53, 73-81.
Gordon, C., & Debus, R. (2002). Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 483–511.
Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). Dialogue: a theoretical framework for distance education instructional systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 137-144.
Gow, L., Kember, D., & Chow, R. (1991). The Effects of English Language Ability on Approaches to Learning. RELC, 22, 49-68.
Graham, C., Cagiltay, K., Lim, B.-R., Craner, J., & Duffy, T. M. (2001). Seven principles for effective teaching: A practical lens for evaluating online courses. Retrieved May, 12, 2009, from http://sln.suny.edu/sln/public/original.nsf/0/b495223246cabd6b85256a090058ab98
Gramling, J., & Nelson, J. (2001). Preservice Teacher Education and the Internet: Expanding Perspectives Toward a Profession. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2001.
Guzdial, M., Rick, J., & Kehoe, C. (2001). Beyond Adoption to Invention: teacher-Created Collaborative Activities in Higher Education. The Journal of the learning Sciences, 10, 265-279.
Hacker, D., & Niederhauser, D. (2000). promoting Deep and Durable Learning in the Online Classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 53-63.
Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self- effiacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261-273.
Han, I., & Park, I. (2008). The Effects of Epistemic Belief and Discusion-Facilitating Strategy on Interaction and Satisfaction in Online Discussion. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19, 649-662.
Hansson, H., & van de Bunt-Kokhuis, S. (2004). Internet information-filters and its consequences for e-learning - Conceptual framework and interview study in seven countries. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004, Washington, DC, USA.
Hare, M. K., & Graber, K. C. (2007). Investigating Knowledge Acquisition and Developing Misconceptions of High School Students Enrolled in an Invasion Games Unit. High School Journal, 90(4), 1-14.
Havard, Du, & Olinzock (2005). Deep Learning: The Knowledge, Methods, and Cognition in Instructor-led Online Discussions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6, 125-135.
Healey, W. E. (2006). Phyical-Therpapist Student Approaches to Learning During Clinical-Education Experiences: A Qualititive Study. The University of San Francisco, San Francisco.
Hellebrandt, J. (1999). Virtual collaborations in the Spanish class: from E-mail to Web design and CD-ROM development, links between students in the United States and Ecuador. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 59-70.
Heraud, J.-M., France, L., & Heili, J. (2006). Observing a learning scenario in an e-learning platform. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Horn, C., & Bruning, R. (2004). The Role of Online Discussion in Promoting Critical Thinking Using :Case Studies with PreService Teachers. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004, Lugano, Switzerland.
Hosie, P., Schibeci, R., & Backhaus, A. (2005). A framework and checklists for evaluating online learning in higher education Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 539-553.
Hoskins, S. L., & Hooff, J. C. V. (2005). Motivation and ability: which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? . British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 177–192.
Hunter, J. M., & Brake, L. (2002). Student Perceptions of Austin Peay State University Online Courses. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2002, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Hutchinson, D. (2007). Teaching Practices for Effective Cooperative Learning in an Online Learning Environment (OLE). Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(3).
Jinsong, Z., & Walls, R. T. (2006). INSTRUCTORS' SELF-PERCEIVED PEDAGOGICAL PRINCIPLE IMPLEMENTATION IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(4), 413-426.
Jones, S. (2002). The Internet Goes to College: How students are living in the future with today’s technology Washington, D.C. : Pew Internet & American Life Project
Kafai, Y., & Carter-Ching, C. (2001). Affordences of Colaborative Software design Planing for Elementary Students' Science Talk. The Journal of the learning Sciences, 10, 323-363.
Keating, A. B., & Hargitai, J. (1999). The Wired Professor: A Guide to Incorporating The World Wide Web in College Instruction. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. The Journal of Higher Education, 65, 58-74.
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty‐first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30, 257-274.
Kovalchick, A., & Dawson, K. ( 2004). Education and technology: an encyclopedia Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Kovalik, S., & Olsen, K. (1993). ITI: The Model, Intergrated Thematic Instruction (2ed ed.). Oak Creek, AZ: Susan Kovalik and Associates.
Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006). Online Discussion and Self-Regulated Learning: Effects of Instructional Methods on Mathematical Literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 218-230.
Krathwohl, D. R. (1998). Methods of educational & social science research: An integrated approach (2 ed.). New York: Longman.
Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 153-160.
Lepper, M., & Chabay, R. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Instruction: Conflicting Views on the Role of Motivational Processes in Computer-Based Education. Educational Psychologist, 20, 217-230.
Lepper, M., & Malone (1987). Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivation for learning (Vol. 3).
Leung, D. Y. P., & Kember, D. (2003). The Relationship between Approaches to Learning and Reflection Upon Practice. Educational Psychology, 23, 61-71.
Leung, M. t., & Chan, K. w. (2001). Construct Validity and Psychometric Properties of the REvised Two-factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) in the Hong Kong Context. Paper presented at the Association for Research in Education (AARE). from http;//www.aare.edu/01pap/ch01708.htm
Livingston, K., & Condie, R. (2006). The Impact of an Online Learning Program on Teaching and Learning Strategies Theory Into Practice, 45, 150-158.
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: implications for theory and practice Studies in Higher Education, 22, 27-52.
Loyo, A., & Rivero, M. (2004). Distance learning: a study of studentsí perceptions in a technology-enhanced environment. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Loyo, A. C., & Rivero, M. (2004). Distance Learning: a Study of Students’ Perceptions in a Technology-Enhanced Environment Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2004.
Lundberg, N. R. (2007). Research Update: Creating Motivational Climates. Parks & Recreation, 42.
Lytras, M., & Naeve, A. (2006). Semantic e-learning: Synthesising Fantasies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 479-491.
Majeski, R., & Stover, M. (2007). Deep Learning in Asynchronous Online Gerontology Courses. Educational Gerontology, 33, 171-185.
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning, Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
Mattick, K., Dennis, I., & Bligh, J. (2004). Approaches to learning and studying in medical students: validation of a revised inventory and its relation to student characteristics and performance Under Graduate Medical Education, 38, 535-543.
Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia learning (1 ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McLoughlin, C. (1999). Culturally responsive technology use: developing an on-line community of learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 231-234.
McVay, G. J., Snyder, K. D., & Graetz, K. A. (2005). Evolution of a laptop university: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 513-524.
Milwaukee, U. (2006). Hybrid Courses Retrieved December 3 2006, 2006, from http://www4.uwm.edu/ltc/hybrid/
Monaghan, J. M., & Clement, J. (1999). Use of a computer simulation to develop mental simulations for understanding relative motion concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 921-944.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of Guidance, Reflection, and Interactivity in an Agent-Based Multimedia Game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 117-128.
Muis, K. R. (2007). The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173-190.
Neusner, N., Basso, P., Brenna, S., & Lobet, I. (2001). The boomers' kids get a job. U.S. News & World Report, 131.
Newlin, M. H., & Wang, A. Y. (2002). Integrating Technology and Pedagogy: Web Instruction and Seven Principles of Undergraduate Education. Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), 325-330.
Paas, F., Renkl., A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. educational psychologist, 38, 1-4.
Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 847-858.
Papastergiou, M. (2006). Course Management Systems as Tools for the Creation of Online Learning Environments:Evaluation from a Social Constructivist Perspective and Implications for their Design. International Journal on E-Learning, 5, 593-622.
Parry, S., & Dunn, L. (2000). Benchmarking as a Meaning Approach to Learning in Online Settings. Studies in Continuing Education, 2, 219-234.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3ed ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Paulsen, M. (2004). Theory and Practice of Online Learning (Vol. 5).
Paz Dennen, V. (2007). Presence and Positioning as Components of Online Instructor Persona Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 95–108.
Pelletier, J. (2004). Developing of a Web-based Focus Groups for Constructing Pre-service General Inclusive Physical Education Teaching Knowledge. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Phan, H., & Deo, B. (2006). Approaches to Learning in Educational Psychology and Mathematics: A Comparative Analysis in the South Pacific Region. Paper presented at the AARE Conference - 2006. from http://www.aare.edu.au/06pap/pha06065.pdf
Phan, H. P., & Deo, B. (2006). Approaches to Learning in Educatioal Psychology and Mathematics: A Coparative Anaysis in the South Pacific Region. Retrieved November, 23, 2007, from Australian Association for Research in Education: http://www.aare.edu.au/06pap/pha06065.pdf
Popovich, C. J., & Neel, R. E. (2005). Characteristics of Distance Education Programs at Accredited Business Schools The American Journal of Distance Education, 19, 229-240.
Prosser, M. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher education. Philadephia, PA: Open University Press.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as Facilitators: What Autonomy-Supportive Teachers Do and Why Their Students Benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 225-236.
Reid, W., Duvall, E., & Evens, P. (2005). Can we influence medical students’ approaches to learning? . Medical Teacher, 77, 401-407.
Repman, J., Carlson, R., & Zinskie, C. (2004). Interactive Communication Tools in E-Learning: What Works? Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004, Washington, DC, USA.
Repman, J., Carlson, R., & Zinskie, C. (2004). Beyond the Discussion Board: Exploring the Use of CMC in Online Teacher Education. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rhem, J. (1995). Deep/Surface Approaches To Learning: An Introduction. The National Teahing and Learning Forum, 5, 1-5.
Richardson, J. (2003). Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of Academic Quality in a Short Web-Based Course British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 433-442.
Richardson, J. (2005). Students’ Approaches to Learning and Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education. Educational Psychology, 25, 673-680.
Richardson, J., & Price, L. (2003). Approaches to Studding and Perceptions of Academic Quality in Electronically Delivered Courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 45-56.
Richardson, J. C., & Newby, T. (2006). The Role of Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20, 23-37.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2004). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in a short web-based course British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 433–442.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students’ Approaches to Learning and Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education. Educational Psychology, 25, 673-680.
Ritter, M. E., & Lemke, K. A. (2000). Addressing the `Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education' with Internet-enhanced Education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(1), 100.
Roach, M., Blackmore, P., & Dempster, J. A. (2001). Supporting High-Level Learning through Research-Based Methods: A Framework for Course Development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38, 369-382.
Rosie, A. (2000). Online Pedagogies and the Promotion of "Deep Learning". Information Service & Use, 20, 109-116.
Samarawickrema, G., & Benson, R. (2004). Helping academic staff to design electronic learning and teaching approaches British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 659–662
Sargeant, J., Curran, V., Allen, M., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Ho, K. (2006). Facilitating Interpersonal Interaction and Learning Online: Linking Theory and Practice. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 128-136.
Seegers, G., Puttenand, C. M. v., & Brabander, C. J. d. (2002). Goal orientation, perceived task outcome and task demands in mathematics tasks: Effects on students’ attitude in actual task settings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 365-384.
SEEL (2007). Student Experience Literature Review Retrieved Febuary 6th, 2009, from http://elesig.ning.com/page/2007026:Page:5390
Shroff, R. H., Vogel, D. R., & Coombes, J. (2008). Assessing Individual-level Factors Supporting Student Intrinsic Motivation in Online Discussions: A Qualitative Study Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(1).
Simbo, F. (1988). The Effects of Note Taking Approaches on Student Achievement in Secondary School Geography. Journal of Educational Research, 81.
Smith, P. (2005). Learning Preferences and Readiness for Online Learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 3-12.
Smith, S. M. (2002). Using the Social Cognitive Model to Explain Vocational Interest in Information Technology Vocational Interest in Information Technology Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 20.
Snelgrove, S., & Slater, J. (2003). Approaches to Learning: Psychometric Testing of a Study Process Questionnaire. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43, 496-505.
Solomon, G. (2003). Project- Based Learning: a Primer. Technology & Learning, 23, 20-27.
Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. (2005). Implementation of a Holistic Model for Quality in Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 11.
Stevens, D., & Levi, A. (2005). Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time, Convey Effective Feedback, and Promote Student Learning. Sterling, VA 20166: Stylus.
Stoyanov, S., & Kirschner, P. (2004). Expert Concept Mapping Method for Defining the Charaoteristics of Adaptive E-Learning: ALFANET Project Case. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52, 41-56.
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2003). Students' Strategic Use of Multiple Sources During Expository Text Reading: A Longitudinal Think-Aloud Study. Cognition & Instruction, 21(2), 113-147.
Svinicki, M. (2007). Moving Beyond "Why it worked", The Ongoing Evolution of Research on Problem-Based Learning in Medical Education. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 49-61.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293 - 332.
teAchnology (2008). The Online Teacher Resource Retrieved Febuary, 15, 2008, from http://www.teach-nology.com/glossary/terms/l/
Tella, A. (2006). The Impact of Self-Efficacy and Prior Computer Experience on the Creativity of New Librarians in Selected Universities Libraries in Southwest Nigeria Library Philosophy and Practice, 8.
Thorpe, M. (2000). Reflective learning and distance learning made to mix by design and by assesment. Information Service & Use, 20, 145-158.
Tiffin, J., & Rajasingham, L. (1995). In Search of the Virtual Class: Education in an Information Society. New York, NY: Routledge.
Trigwell, K., & Ashwin, P. (2006). An exploratory study of situated conceptions of learning and
learning environments Higher Education, 51, 243-258.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275-285.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41 19-31.
Vesely, P., Bloom, L., & Sherlock, J. (2007). Key Elements of Building Online Community: Comparing Faculty and Student Perceptions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3).
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walko, J., & Dwyer, F. (1990). Effect of Varied Note Taking Strategies in Compleating Visualized Instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 17.
Wang, S. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2006). The Effects of a Web-Based Learning Environment on Student Motivation in a High School Earth Science Course. ETR&D, 54, 597-621.
Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (1980). Individual and Contextual Differences in the Approaches to Learning of Austrailan Secondary School Students. Educational Psychology, 10, 333-342.
Waugh, R., & Anderson, P. (1998). A Rasch measurement model of the Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 95-112.
Webb, E., Jones, A., Barker, P., & van Schaik, P. (2004). Using e-learning dialogues in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), 93–103.
Webb, N., & Shavelson, R. (1985). Computers, Education and Educational Psychologists. Educational Psychologist, 20, 163-165.
Weber, M. (1949). Max Weber on the methodology of the social sciences; translated and edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. With a foreword by Edward A. Shils: Free Press.
Weerasinghe, A., Mitrovic, A (2006). Faciliting deep learning through self-explanaion in an open-ended domain. International Journal of Knoledge-Based and Enginering Systems, 10, 3-19.
Weigel, V. B. (2002). Deep Learning for a Digital Age: Technology's Untapped Potential to Enrich Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
West, R., Wright, G., & Graham, C. (2005). Blogs, Wikis, and Aggregators: A New Vocabulary for Promoting Reflection and Collaboration in a Preservice Technology Integration Course. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2005, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Whatis.com (2008). What is Virtual Learning Environment? Retrieved 1/18/09, 2009, from http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci866691,00.html
Wikinvest (2009). Blackboard (BBBB) Retrieved 5/9/2009, 2009, from http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Blackboard_(BBBB)
Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 87-101.
Wilson, T. D. (1994). THE PROPER PROTOCOL: Validity and Completeness of Verbal Reports. Psychological Science, 5(5), 249-252.
Yang, Y.-T. (2002). Asynchronous On-Line Discussions: Facilitating Critical Thinking Skills in Distance Education. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2002, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Young, K. A. (2005). Direct from the source: the value of ‘think-aloud’ data in understanding learning. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6, 19-33.
YourDicitioary.com (2009). Yoir Dictionary Dot Com Retrieved 5/21, 2009, from http://www.yourdictionary.com/attribute
Zeegers, P. (2002). A Revision of the Biggs' Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ). Higher Education Research & Development, 21, 73-92.
Zinn, L. M. (1990). Identifying your philosophical orientation. In M. W. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult Learning Methods (pp. 39-77). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
I was just reading an article by Osika, Johnson, & Buteau, 2009 that talks about faculty perspective of tools online. This looks to me like most faculty still see online learning has a text delivery system. With only 50% saying that discussion boards are useful and 38% not even using them!
